CINECITTÀ, A BRAND WITH A SOLID, LONG-STANDING REPUTATION

In judgment No.14497/2025, issued on 20 October 2025, the Rome Commercial Court reaffirmed the notoriety of the historic ‘CINECITTÀ’ trademark.

Assisted by lawyer Fabia De Bono of Barzanò & Zanardo, Cinecittà S.p.A. took action for counterfeiting against two competitors who had used the figurative sign ‘CINECITTÀ 3’ and carried out a series of unfair competitive practices aimed at creating confusion between the parties to their own advantage.

The judges ascertained the notoriety and distinctiveness of the ‘CINECITTÀ’ trademark and the existence of counterfeiting and anti-competitive behaviour. They declared ‘Cinecittà 3′ null and void, ordered the cancellation of the competitors’ company and domain names, prohibited any further use of the sign and ordered the counterparties to pay €35,000 in damages and reimburse legal costs.

Of particular interest in the judgment is the examination of the trademark’s validity under Article 28 of the Italian Industrial Property Code, which details the criteria for determining the starting date of the five-year period, the level of knowledge of the contested trademark, and the burden of proof. Another notable aspect is the section on the criteria for calculating compensation for intellectual property infringement.

This is a resounding success for the protection of the cultural and commercial identity of the CINECITTÀ trademark in the film industry and beyond.

Could also interest you

WTR 1000 2026: Gold ranking for Barzanò & Zanardo

Barzanò & Zanardo has been awarded a Gold ranking in the 2026 edition of WTR 1000 – The World’s Leading Trademark Professionals, one of the most authoritative international guides dedicated to trademark practice. “Hailed as a “market leader for prosecution work” by peers and foreign associates, Barzanò & Zanardo has served as a staunch trademark […]

Some sow a ‘Grana’, others stand up to protect it

Judgment no. 2955/2025, published on 9 October, partially overturned the first instance decision of the Venice Court itself, which had instead upheld Brazzale’s arguments, finding that the term “Grana” had become generic. On that basis, the court had rejected the claims brought by the Consortium for the Protection of Grana Padano, which had raised concerns […]

Pharmaceuticals vs Cosmetics: EUIPO Report and practical implications for companies

A market in transition: why is it increasingly difficult to distinguish between pharmaceuticals and cosmetics? The traditional boundaries between the pharmaceutical and cosmetic sectors are becoming increasingly blurred, due in large part to the growing convergence of distribution channels and marketing strategies. Moreover, evolving market trends have led to the emergence of “hybrid” product categories […]

Services