The Internet of Things: intellectual property finding itself between opportunity and new challenges

On June 27th and 28th the IoT Tech Expo Europe, one of the most important global events dedicated to the internet of things, will be held in Amsterdam.1 Over 300 exhibitors, and as many speakers, will present the latest advances devoted to the subject, along with innovations in the field of blockchain and artificial intelligence.

The internet of things is a neologism that has generated great interest with both business insiders and companies for much of this decade. Behind this term lies a paradigm that advocates the embedding of the internet into everyday objects. Supporters of this vision imagine a future where everything is interconnected: thanks to a wide array of communication technology, our appliances, cars, homes and even the products we buy will be able to exploit the potential of the network to interact with users in an intelligent way.

Some of the most interesting applications of this paradigm have already been introduced to the market and give us some idea of ​​the future that awaits us.2 For example, soon we will be able to start a car or permit it to be used through a simple app, which will allow us to monitor its use. Blockchain technology will ensure secure and encrypted communication. Our vehicles will in fact become part of the global network.

According to analysts,3 the internet of things, blockchain and artificial intelligence are the three emerging technologies that will drive IT investments in 2018. Global spending is expected to reach 3.7 trillion dollars (an increase of 4.5% compared to last year).

From the point of view of protection of intellectual property, producers of these technologies will face challenges of considerable complexity. These devices are often the collaborative product of components, technologies and software made by many different companies. How to prepare an adequate protection strategy?

IBA experts4 have highlighted how the intellectual property of each component, feature and functionality of these devices can be protected. For example, the functionality of the device itself can be patented. Integrated circuits and microchips can also be patented. The software that makes the product work can be covered by copyright. The design can be properly registered. The databases with which these devices are connected can also be doubly protected: the same storage technology can be patented, just as it is possible to extend copyright to the organizational structure of the database.

The presence of an enormous amount of data collected and processed via the internet of things raises another question: whose data is this and how do you protect their privacy? By their nature, IoT devices must be able to exchange their data with those of another device. This free flow of information makes “protectionist” protection solutions unworkable. Companies should pay even greater attention to the critical issues connected to their business, developing customized strategies based on the nature of the information exchanged.

Both the data structure and their organizational topology can be protected. Connection technology, transmission protocols and security solutions adopted could also be patented.

A proper protection strategy should provide for exemplary contracts with suppliers and their users. Finally, we must not forget that all technology can be the object of reverse engineering: one should also think about the adequate protection of one’s own trade secrets.

Thanks to legal expertise, combined with engineering specialization, the professionals of Barzanò & Zanardo can help companies to estimate the impact of these innovations on their business: a careful assessment of costs and opportunities is accompanied by the choice of the most suitable technology to your needs.

[1] https://www.iottechexpo.com/2018/03/iot/iot-blockchain-and-ai-the-3-emerging-technologies-driving-it-spending-in-2018/

[2] https://www.porsche.com/uk/aboutporsche/pressreleases/pcgb/?lang=none&pool=international-de&id=479342

[3] https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3845563

[4] https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=5c133514-208d-4e69-85bb-4a96406d71c0

 

 

Could also interest you

50 SHADES OF GREEN (CLAIMS): CONSUMER PROTECTION IN A SUSTAINABLE WORLD

On one hand, this is certainly true. “It is good for the environment”, “zero impact” (the so-called “green claims” or “environmental claims“), etc. are undoubtedly attractive statements both to the public and to companies, which not infrequently include these slogans not only in their products but also in their distinctive signs, make their brands “green” […]

Anti-Counterfeiting Report: Publication of the 2022-2023 Report

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the counterfeit market, drawing on data from the Agency of Excise Duties, ADM and the Guardia di Finanza (GDF) regarding products seized between 2008 and 2022. Notably, the counterfeit items confiscated in Italy primarily consist of clothing, footwear, and accessory items. According to the IPERICO database (Intellectual Property […]

SHAPE AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRADEMARKS IN BARILLA’S LEGAL BATTLE Analysis and comparison of judgements

COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS CASES: FERRERO vs MOCCA S.R.O. SPOL: Tic Tac To provide context to this recent ruling, it is valuable to compare it with the case of Ferrero vs. Mocca S.r.o. Spol, which involved the three-dimensional trademark consisting of the packaging of “Tic Tac” sweets. Despite differences in the products involved, both cases underline […]

Services

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our site. Cookies are files stored in your browser and are used to help personalise your web experience, for more information click here. By continuing to use our website without changing th e settings, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.