Can I register a slogan as a pharmaceutical trademark?

Slogans can help the corporate or product trademark to build its precise identity and brand awareness, conveying to the market and to the respective clients the values of the company in a concise and persuasive way.

The use of slogans is a widespread practice in the pharmaceutical sector, where it is essential for companies to convey one’s vision in an energetic and clear way. Let’s think of well-known pay-offs such as “Science for a better life” (by Bayer), “Doing now what patients need next” (by Hoffmann-La Roche), “People.Passion.Possibilities” (by AbbVie), “Advancing health together” (by Elevance Health), “InventigforLife” (by Merck & Co).

However, registering a slogan as a trademark to obtain an exclusive right, even if possible, can be problematic both in the EU and in Italy.

Why is it difficult to register a pay-off as a trademark?

By their nature, slogans convey an advertising or laudatory message which, as such, may not be able to provide information about the origin of a product or service and therefore fulfill the function of the trademark.

In fact, according to the European jurisprudence, the consumer is not used to formulating hypotheses on the commercial origin of products on the basis of promotional pay-offs and, furthermore, the level of attention is low in these cases, regardless of the type of goods and the specialization of the target public (*).

A slogan has a distinctive character when it is sufficiently inventive, original or surprising, triggers a cognitive process in the public’s mind or requires an interpretative effort (e.g., it contains an allusion, pun, unusual syntactic structures, etc.). These characteristics make it memorable and recognizable and, therefore, distinctive for the public, who will not perceive the pay-off only as a mere laudatory formula (21/01/2010, C-398/08; 13/04/2011, T-523 /09).

These are the criteria established by law, but a few concrete examples of recently rejected trademarks (the majority) and successfully registered trademarks in the EU and Italy will be presented below.

European Union

Examples of rejected trademarks

The trademarks MOINS DE MIGRAINE POUR VIVRE MIEUX and WENIGER MIGRÄNE. MEHR VOM LEBEN. (08/07/2020, T-697/19) (in English, “LESS MIGRAINE FOR A BETTER LIFE”) with reference to goods in classes 16 (printed material relating to the treatment of migraine) and 44 (information relating to the treatment migraine) have been rejected for lack of distinctive character.

The Court of Justice concluded that the pay-off was not unusual from the point of view of the grammatical rules of the local languages, the expression did not convey any originality and did not require an effort of interpretation for the consumer.

Similarly, the EUIPO Board of Appeals has rejected the registration of the pay-offs HEALTHIER DOGS, HAPPY LIVE (27/02/2023, R2097/2022-4), BEYOND THERAPEUTICS (10/03/2021, R 2317/ 2020-4), and ENABLING ANYWHERE CARE (02/12/2020, R 1635/2020-5), all with reference to class 5, for being simple promotional formulas.

Examples of registered trademarks

Differently from the above-mentioned pay-offs, the slogan IT’S LIKE MILK BUT MADE FOR HUMANS (01/20/2021, T-253/20) has been considered distinctive with reference to products in classes 29, 30 and 32.

The Court of Justice concluded that in this case the consumer makes an interpretative effort in reading the sentence, perceiving a contrast between the first part of the trademark (IT’S LIKE MILK) and the second (MADE FOR HUMANS), questioning the common idea according to which milk is an essential element of human nutrition: the formulation of the sentence disorientates the consumer and the intrinsic message of the slogan makes it recognizable and, therefore, distinctive.

Furthermore, the trademarks BAKE FOR HEALTH (No. 018348037) and DNA4YOU (No. 017931880, R 1469/2019-4) have been successfully registered, both considered to be sufficiently original and inventive with reference to products in class 5.

Italy

The Supreme Court has recently ruled on the matter (order No. 37697 of December 23rd, 2022), clarifying that local regulations can allow the registration of slogans as trademarks. However, the pay-off “LA TUA PELLE MERITA DI ESSERE TRATTATA BENE” (English: “YOUR SKIN DESERVES TO BE TREATED WELL”) for cosmetic/pharmaceutical products has not been considered distinctive.

Actually, the tendency of the Italian Patent and Trademark Office seems to be more restrictive than in the past in assessing the distinctiveness of slogans, also with reference to trademarks in English, evidently now considered better known by local consumers.

In fact, the following Italian designations of international trademarks have been rejected: MEDIQ. COMMITTED TO YOUR CARE (No. 1144253), REVOLUTIONIZING THE ORTHOPEDIC SUPPLY CHAIN (No. 1596093), HEALTH OF JOINTS IS IN RELIABLE HANDS (No. 1466670), ORTHO TECHNOLOGY INVENTED HERE (No. 1587216) in classes 5 / 10.

However, the Italian trademarks, MUOVITI RESPIRA VIVI (No. 302018000027175) (English: MOVE BREATHE LIVE) and CONNETTITI AL BENESSERE (No. 302018000027170) (English: CONNECT TO WELLNESS) have recently been registered in class 5.

Protection of slogans through copyright

Slogans can also be protected by copyright, if they are sufficiently “original”. In practice, however, the judicial cases of rejection are certainly more numerous compared to those which ended with an outcome in favour of the protection of the pay-off through copyright law.

Conclusions

The protection of the slogan as a trademark is feasible, but obtaining the registration of the trademark can be complicated both in the EU and in Italy.

In these cases, it is essential to build the best filing solution that takes into account the nature of the pay-off, its application and the possible expedients that allow the trademark to be registered.

We remain at your complete disposal to provide you with our best strategic advice in this regard.

(*) As also reported in the EUIPO study “Case-law Research Report – The Distinctive Character of Slogans”, published in March 2022 and available at the following link. It is a collection of the General Court, the Court of Justice and the EUIPO Commission of Appeals, prepared with the aim of identifying and analyzing the jurisprudence and trends in the field of slogans to improve consistency in decision-making processes.

Could also interest you

Golfera, with Barzanò & Zanardo, triumphs in the battle to protect the shape trademark

This ruling not only acknowledges the notoriety of the “Golfetta” trademark but also prohibits the use of a similar trademark concerning high-protein cured meats. This significant decision underscores the legal valuation of three-dimensional trademarks, reinforcing entrepreneurial investment aimed at solidifying market positioning for these products. Then, what was the pivotal element behind the success of […]

The Battle of Gianduiotto

The gianduiotto, the renowned, prism-shaped chocolate that figures among the symbols of the city of Turin, has been at the heart of a conflict between the Committee for “Gianduiotto di Torino” PGI and the Swiss giant Lindt & Sprüngli. After nearly two years of negotiations, the parties have reached a compromise that paves the way […]

50 SHADES OF GREEN (CLAIMS): CONSUMER PROTECTION IN A SUSTAINABLE WORLD

On one hand, this is certainly true. “It is good for the environment”, “zero impact” (the so-called “green claims” or “environmental claims“), etc. are undoubtedly attractive statements both to the public and to companies, which not infrequently include these slogans not only in their products but also in their distinctive signs, make their brands “green” […]

Services

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our site. Cookies are files stored in your browser and are used to help personalise your web experience, for more information click here. By continuing to use our website without changing th e settings, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.