Fakes’ Purchasers Should Fear Fines and Crimes

Whoever purchases counterfeit products for personal use can incur in an administrative fine, from Euros 100 to 7000, according to the conditions provided by the well-known Italian Legislative Decree no. 35/05, which becomes much more severe against fakes’ importers or resellers, providing a fine from 20.000,00 to 1000.000,00 Euros.

The mentioned rules may appear much more meaningful if you only consider the enormous damages that counterfeiting generates: more than 140 Euros lost by every single Italian citizen each year (EUIPO 2018), 88.000 full-time employees lost in sectors damaged by fakes (OCSE 2019), just to give a couple of quick but incisive examples!

In other words, counterfeiting creates negative consequences on the whole Community!

Hence, the classification of counterfeiting as administrative offence – in the above mentioned Legislative Decree 35/05 – describes residual conducts, whereas for the Italian Criminal Code counterfeiting is a crime.

Namely, more than one criminal offence related to counterfeiting is provided by the Italian Criminal Code, grounded on the precept that counterfeiting violates the Public Interest of, among other, the certainty of economic and juridical relations.

Several case-law decisions rose from the said principle to give exact interpretations of criminal rules against counterfeiting, and consequently prevent fakes’ importers or resellers to carry on their illicit trade running the sole risk of a fine, despite abstractly high.

In conclusion, the regulatory and punitive framework appears correctly articulated: fakes’ purchasers are responsible, at each level, towards the People they are part of. But the above reported data reveal that deterrence is not enough to stop the phenomenon, because further interests are at stake.

 

We shall revert to you about it. Follow us.

Could also interest you

Anti-Counterfeiting Report: Publication of the 2022-2023 Report

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the counterfeit market, drawing on data from the Agency of Excise Duties, ADM and the Guardia di Finanza (GDF) regarding products seized between 2008 and 2022. Notably, the counterfeit items confiscated in Italy primarily consist of clothing, footwear, and accessory items. According to the IPERICO database (Intellectual Property […]

The civil procedure Reform and the protection of IP. What changes?

2 The effects of the Cartabia Reform in intellectual property disputes 2.1 Amendments to the ordinary procedure As already anticipated, the Cartabia Reform affected several fronts and modified few procedural aspects. In this article, we will concentrate only on the rules that can have a direct impact on the cases involving intellectual property rights. As […]

KEY CHANGES OF THE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE TRADEMARK LAW OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (DRAFT FOR COMMENTS)

Definition of trademarks (Article 4) The revised Draft expands the scope of trademark definition, including the wording “other elements” in addition to “words, graphics, letters, numbers, three-dimensional signs, colour combinations and sounds”. The amendment shall allow non-traditional trademarks (such as i.e. positon/colour marks which have been anyhow confirmed in judicial practice) to be granted within […]

Services

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our site. Cookies are files stored in your browser and are used to help personalise your web experience, for more information click here. By continuing to use our website without changing th e settings, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.