The New Frontiers of Anti-Counterfeiting Technology

Anti-counterfeiting technologies have a huge potential in the fight against counterfeiting. They are an essential tool protecting both companies and consumers, as proved by EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and European Commission’s growing attention to this topic, which led up to the brilliant initiative of Blockathon EU 2018[1].

 

 

 

 

 

.

This was the first European contest organized to inspire the creation of new anti-counterfeiting devices, based on blockchain technology. The contest gathered 11 programmers and among them the Italian company Cryptomice stood out, winning the award for the best solution with the prototype “virtual twin”, also based on blockchain technology, therefore impossible to forge or counterfeit. Although systems based on this technology, grounded on “data blocks” (hence the term “blockchain”), are relatively new, the progress in the field of anti-counterfeiting technologies protecting intellectual property has been a crucial theme over the last years.

As described in a report from the European Commission [2], the most frequently used systems are labels or tags that are able to communicate through RFID or NFC technology. These devices can certify the authenticity of a product and allow its movements to be followed along the entire value chain — even after purchase.

The benefits of traceability are evident at multiple levels even for companies that implement advanced methods. Knowing the exact path of a product along its value chain allows, for example, the improvement of supply chain efficiency. The devices would allow real-time monitoring of data, allowing optimization of production and organizational aspects. The benefits would continue even after purchase. For example, after-sales service could provide better assistance by tracing a defective product more accurately.

In the field of anti-counterfeiting, traceability technology makes it possible to protect the product in various ways. First of all, they constitute a deterrent to counterfeiting itself since they introduce an element of complexity that would make the creation of a forgery more expensive. In addition, they facilitate the work of customs authorities by making it possible to identify an authentic product immediately and offer an important tool for protecting customers.

As mentioned, the Blockchain system is among the latest technologies applied in the industry and the newly implemented prototypes shall be looked at closely by stakeholders in order to fully understand and exploit their intrinsic value: the creation of a public and unchangeable register allowing the attainment of a product identity card as a guarantee to producers and consumers.

Before adopting a specific device to allow for traceability and protection from counterfeiting, it is necessary to develop a personalized protection strategy to maximize the value of the investment. Thanks to legal expertise, combined with engineering specialization, the professionals of Barzanò & Zanardo can help companies estimate the impact of these innovations on their business: a careful assessment of costs and opportunities is accompanied by the choice of technology best suited to their needs.

 

 

 

 

[1] https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/it/web/observatory/blockathon/aims-of-competition
[2] http://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/13393?locale=en

Could also interest you

Anti-Counterfeiting Report: Publication of the 2022-2023 Report

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the counterfeit market, drawing on data from the Agency of Excise Duties, ADM and the Guardia di Finanza (GDF) regarding products seized between 2008 and 2022. Notably, the counterfeit items confiscated in Italy primarily consist of clothing, footwear, and accessory items. According to the IPERICO database (Intellectual Property […]

The civil procedure Reform and the protection of IP. What changes?

2 The effects of the Cartabia Reform in intellectual property disputes 2.1 Amendments to the ordinary procedure As already anticipated, the Cartabia Reform affected several fronts and modified few procedural aspects. In this article, we will concentrate only on the rules that can have a direct impact on the cases involving intellectual property rights. As […]

KEY CHANGES OF THE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE TRADEMARK LAW OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (DRAFT FOR COMMENTS)

Definition of trademarks (Article 4) The revised Draft expands the scope of trademark definition, including the wording “other elements” in addition to “words, graphics, letters, numbers, three-dimensional signs, colour combinations and sounds”. The amendment shall allow non-traditional trademarks (such as i.e. positon/colour marks which have been anyhow confirmed in judicial practice) to be granted within […]

Services

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our site. Cookies are files stored in your browser and are used to help personalise your web experience, for more information click here. By continuing to use our website without changing th e settings, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.