European Medicines Agency (EMA): 7th Revision of the Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products.

The 7th Revision of the Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products processed through the centralized procedure, adopted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), entered into force on January 1, 2024, [available at the link, Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products processed through the centralised procedure (europa.eu)]. The previous Revision dates back to May 2014.

The scope of this Guideline is to provide information on the overall procedure for submitting and reviewing the acceptability of proposed (invented) names for human medicinal products processed through the centralised procedure, as well as detailed guidance on the criteria applied by the Name Review Group (NRG) when reviewing the acceptability of names.

The NRG Group

The NRG Group is dedicated to the evaluation of trade names of medicinal products reviewed by EMA and aims to consider whether the manufacturer’s proposed name may create health risks or concerns for consumers.

Specifically, the name of a medicinal product:

  • shall not have misleading therapeutic or pharmaceutical connotations;
  • shall avoid misleading about the composition of the medicinal product;
  • shall not create confusion with the name of another medicinal product.

The NRG is composed of representatives from EU member countries and chaired by a member of EMA.

The main topics of the 7th Revision

The current update of the Guidelines provides additional recommendations on the requirements for acceptability and submission of proposed invention names and also clarifies:

  • specific aspects of the criteria applied to address safety and public health concerns;
  • international non-proprietary names’ concerns;
  • product specific concerns;
  • procedures for submitting applications for proposed invention names.

Conclusions

In summary, the latest Revision enriches the list of proposed name selection criteria, including cases drawn from experience gathered in the meantime and summarizing current NRG practice. In addition, this version updates the description of EMA’s process for checking names.

Our Consultants remain at your complete disposal for any clarification or further inquiries regarding this issue and for assistance in the Regulatory field.

Could also interest you

WTR 1000 2026: Gold ranking for Barzanò & Zanardo

Barzanò & Zanardo has been awarded a Gold ranking in the 2026 edition of WTR 1000 – The World’s Leading Trademark Professionals, one of the most authoritative international guides dedicated to trademark practice. “Hailed as a “market leader for prosecution work” by peers and foreign associates, Barzanò & Zanardo has served as a staunch trademark […]

Some sow a ‘Grana’, others stand up to protect it

Judgment no. 2955/2025, published on 9 October, partially overturned the first instance decision of the Venice Court itself, which had instead upheld Brazzale’s arguments, finding that the term “Grana” had become generic. On that basis, the court had rejected the claims brought by the Consortium for the Protection of Grana Padano, which had raised concerns […]

CINECITTÀ, A BRAND WITH A SOLID, LONG-STANDING REPUTATION

Assisted by lawyer Fabia De Bono of Barzanò & Zanardo, Cinecittà S.p.A. took action for counterfeiting against two competitors who had used the figurative sign ‘CINECITTÀ 3’ and carried out a series of unfair competitive practices aimed at creating confusion between the parties to their own advantage. The judges ascertained the notoriety and distinctiveness of […]

Services