European Medicines Agency (EMA): 7th Revision of the Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products.

The 7th Revision of the Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products processed through the centralized procedure, adopted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), entered into force on January 1, 2024, [available at the link, Guideline on the acceptability of names for human medicinal products processed through the centralised procedure (europa.eu)]. The previous Revision dates back to May 2014.

The scope of this Guideline is to provide information on the overall procedure for submitting and reviewing the acceptability of proposed (invented) names for human medicinal products processed through the centralised procedure, as well as detailed guidance on the criteria applied by the Name Review Group (NRG) when reviewing the acceptability of names.

The NRG Group

The NRG Group is dedicated to the evaluation of trade names of medicinal products reviewed by EMA and aims to consider whether the manufacturer’s proposed name may create health risks or concerns for consumers.

Specifically, the name of a medicinal product:

  • shall not have misleading therapeutic or pharmaceutical connotations;
  • shall avoid misleading about the composition of the medicinal product;
  • shall not create confusion with the name of another medicinal product.

The NRG is composed of representatives from EU member countries and chaired by a member of EMA.

The main topics of the 7th Revision

The current update of the Guidelines provides additional recommendations on the requirements for acceptability and submission of proposed invention names and also clarifies:

  • specific aspects of the criteria applied to address safety and public health concerns;
  • international non-proprietary names’ concerns;
  • product specific concerns;
  • procedures for submitting applications for proposed invention names.

Conclusions

In summary, the latest Revision enriches the list of proposed name selection criteria, including cases drawn from experience gathered in the meantime and summarizing current NRG practice. In addition, this version updates the description of EMA’s process for checking names.

Our Consultants remain at your complete disposal for any clarification or further inquiries regarding this issue and for assistance in the Regulatory field.

Could also interest you

Pharmaceuticals vs Cosmetics: EUIPO Report and practical implications for companies

A market in transition: why is it increasingly difficult to distinguish between pharmaceuticals and cosmetics? The traditional boundaries between the pharmaceutical and cosmetic sectors are becoming increasingly blurred, due in large part to the growing convergence of distribution channels and marketing strategies. Moreover, evolving market trends have led to the emergence of “hybrid” product categories […]

Barzanò & Zanardo S.p.A. awarded European Trusted Flagger Certification

This prestigious certification has been granted under Article 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) and in accordance with AGCOM Resolution No. 283/24/CONS, confirming our role as a Trusted Flagger in the following key areas: Click here to see the official European Commission list of DSA Trusted flaggers. What This Means for Our Clients As […]

“The Requirement for genuine use of the trademark” – Guide

Let us begin by stating that in Italy and the European Union, there is a grace period granted to the trademark holder, allowing them five years from the date of the first registration to start using the trademark. This is a period of time that the legislator grants to the holder/entrepreneur to carry out all […]

Services